An Evaluation of Internal Quality Audit Standards for Learning: Identifying Areas for Improvement in a Higher Education Institution

Authors

  • Selfy Manueke Business Administration Department, Manado State Polytechnic, Manado City, Indonesia
  • Iyaam L. Dua Business Administration Department, Manado State Polytechnic, Manado City, Indonesia
  • Meiske W. Manopo Business Administration Department, Manado State Polytechnic, Manado City, Indonesia
  • Floren Agnesia Sinaga Business Administration Department, Manado State Polytechnic, Manado City, Indonesia
  • Inka M.S. Tumengkol Business Administration Department, Manado State Polytechnic, Manado City, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.366

Keywords:

Internal Quality Audit , Quality Assurance , Learning Quality , Higher Education , Vocational Education

Abstract

Internal quality assurance has become a critical mechanism for improving learning quality in higher education institutions, yet the effectiveness of internal quality audits often depends on how clearly learning standards are structured and implemented within institutional audit systems. This study aims to investigate the existing internal quality audit (IQA) standards for learning at Manado State Polytechnic and to identify areas for improvement. This research employed a qualitative approach by collecting data through document analysis and semi-structured interviews. A total of 15 informants participated in the study, including the head and administrators from the Learning Development and Quality Assurance Center, study program coordinators, and internal auditors. The findings indicate that the internal quality audit process at Manado State Polytechnic follows a three-stage model. However, the quality standards used in the audit application system are unsystematically organized and inconsistently arranged across study programs. Moreover, several essential learning components are not comprehensively included in the quality standards, such as curriculum design, teaching and learning methods, assessment and evaluation, student support and engagement, and lecturers’ performance. These limitations contribute to inefficiencies in the current internal quality audit implementation. This study suggests the reorganization of the quality standards into a chronological framework of “Before Learning,” “During Learning,” and “After Learning” to simplify evidence submission and audit processes. This study contributes to internal quality assurance practices by providing practical insights for quality assurance managers in developing more systematic and effective internal quality audit standards to support continuous improvement in learning quality.

References

Abdullah, R., Ismail, Z., & Smith, M. (2018). Audit committees’ involvement and the effects of quality in the internal audit function on corporate governance. International Journal of Auditing, 22(3), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12124

Baltos, G. C., Chomata, F. S., & Vidakis, I. G. (2018). Quality Management, Standardization and Auditing Meet Multiple Organizational Risks, Strengthening Open Market Understanding and Social Responsibility. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 7(3), 87–94. https://doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2018-0060

Cheng, M. (2017). Reclaiming quality in higher education: a human factor approach. Quality in Higher Education, 23(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2017.1358954

Christ, M. H., Emett, S. A., Summers, S. L., & Wood, D. A. (2021). Prepare for takeoff: improving asset measurement and audit quality with drone-enabled inventory audit procedures. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(4), 1323–1343. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-020-09574-5

Coskun, A., & Gungormus, A. H. (2024). The impacts of internal audit quality and accounting information systems effectiveness on SME manager’s perceptions of external audits. Journal of Management, Economics, and Industrial Organization, 51–72. https://doi.org/10.31039/jomeino.2024.834

Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The Impact of Audit Technology on Audit Task Outcomes: Evidence for Technology‐Based Audit Techniques*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12847

Ferguson, C., Vaismoradi, M., & Glarcher, M. (2025). What’s the Point of Quality and Safety Auditing in Healthcare if Nurses Don’t Use Data to Drive Improvement? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 81(9), 5231–5233. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.70050

Gallagher, K., & Dillon, A. (2023). “Missing the essential aromas”: Interactive online site visits in the international accreditation of teacher education. Issues in Educational Research, 33(3), 957–973.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Manueke, S., Dua, I. L., Manopo, M. W., Sinaga, F. A., & Tumengkol, I. M. (2026). An Evaluation of Internal Quality Audit Standards for Learning: Identifying Areas for Improvement in a Higher Education Institution. Economics, Business, Accounting & Society Review, 5(1), 76–86. https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.366