Frugal Innovation as a Mediating Mechanism between Strategic Flexibility, Sustainability Orientation, and Operational Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.312Keywords:
Frugal Innovation, F&B SMEs, Operational Performance, Sustainability Orientation, Strategic FlexibilityAbstract
Recent studies recognize innovation as a critical pathway for strengthening SME competitiveness and resilience. This study investigates how food and beverage SMEs improve operational performance by transforming strategic flexibility and sustainability orientation into practical, cost-efficient innovation practices. In highly competitive and resource-constrained environments, SMEs must balance efficiency, adaptability, and increasing sustainability expectations. The research focuses on frugal innovation as a pragmatic approach that emphasizes simplicity, affordability, and optimal resource utilization in daily operations. A quantitative research design was employed using survey data collected from owners and operational managers of food and beverage SMEs in the Jabodetabek region. The constructs were measured using established Likert-scale instruments adapted from prior studies. Data were analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), which enables simultaneous assessment of measurement reliability and structural relationships among variables. This approach allows for examining both direct and indirect effects within a mediation framework. The findings indicate that strategic flexibility and sustainability orientation contribute to the development of frugal innovation practices. In turn, frugal innovation significantly enhances operational performance by improving efficiency, reducing operational waste, and strengthening process effectiveness. The results confirm that performance improvements emerge when strategic intentions are translated into concrete, resource-aware innovations. This study contributes by providing empirical evidence that frugal innovation serves as a practical mechanism linking strategic orientation to superior operational outcomes in resource-constrained SMEs.
References
Al-Shuridah, O. M., & Ndubisi, N. O. (2023). The Effect of Sustainability Orientation on CRM Adoption. Sustainability, 15(13), 10054. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310054
Albert, M. (2019). Sustainable frugal innovation - The connection between frugal innovation and sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 237, 117747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117747
Awais, M., Ali, A., Khattak, M. S., Arfeen, M. I., Chaudhary, M. A. I., & Syed, A. (2023). Strategic Flexibility and Organizational Performance: Mediating Role of Innovation. SAGE Open, 13(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231181432
Behnam, S., Cagliano, R., & Grijalvo, M. (2018). How should firms reconcile their open innovation capabilities for incorporating external actors in innovations aimed at sustainable development? Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 950–965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.168
Berndt, A. C., Gomes, G., Borini, F. M., & Bernardes, R. C. (2023). Frugal innovation and operational performance: the role of organizational learning capability. RAUSP Management Journal, 58(3), 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1108/RAUSP-12-2021-0249
Bhandari, K. R., Rana, S., Paul, J., & Salo, J. (2020). Relative exploration and firm performance: Why resource-theory alone is not sufficient? Journal of Business Research, 118, 363–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.07.001
Calantone, R. J., Cavusgil, S. T., & Zhao, Y. (2002). Learning orientation, firm innovation capability, and firm performance. Industrial Marketing Management, 31(6), 515–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-8501(01)00203-6
Chen, M., Chakraborty, S., Xiong, J., Scaringella, L., & Descubes, I. (2021). Business model renewal and environment changes: Insights of Chinese textile industry. Strategic Change, 30(6), 573–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.2471
D’Oria, L., Crook, T. R., Ketchen, D. J., Sirmon, D. G., & Wright, M. (2021). The Evolution of Resource-Based Inquiry: A Review and Meta-Analytic Integration of the Strategic Resources–Actions–Performance Pathway. In Journal of Management (Vol. 47, Issue 6). https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206321994182
De Leede, J., Drupsteen, L., Schrijver, E., Goudswaard, A., Dağ, N., Van der Weide, J., & Verbiest, S. (2020). Labour flexibility practices in Dutch SMEs. Personnel Review, 49(3), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-02-2019-0086
Dhewanto, W., Herliana, S., Yunita, F., Nur Rizqi, V., & Williamson, I. O. (2021). Quadruple Helix Approach to Achieve International Product Quality for Indonesian Food SMEs. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(2), 452–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-020-00644-2
Eide, A. E., Saether, E. A., & Aspelund, A. (2020). An investigation of leaders’ motivation, intellectual leadership, and sustainability strategy in relation to Norwegian manufacturers’ performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 120053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120053
Febrianda, R., Ariyani, L., Hermawati, W., Aminullah, E., & Dinaseviani, A. (2025). Model of Entrepreneurship and Digital Technology in Responding to Green and Non‐Green Innovation: Case Study of Batik SMEs in Indonesia. Sustainable Development, 33(4), 5904–5918. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3444
Iqbal, Q., Piwowar-Sulej, K., & Kallmuenzer, A. (2025). Sustainable development through frugal innovation: the role of leadership, entrepreneurial bricolage and knowledge diversity. Review of Managerial Science, 19, 573–594. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-024-00764-y
Jin, Z., Navare, J., & Lynch, R. (2019). The relationship between innovation culture and innovation outcomes: exploring the effects of sustainability orientation and firm size. R and D Management, 49(4), 607–623. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12351
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Achmad Labanie, Elok Savitri Pusparini

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
















