Unveiling the Dynamics of Tax Compliance: The Implementation and Challenges of the Directorate General of Tax

Authors

  • Sherin Amirtha Liyonna Department of Accounting, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Imarotus Suaidah Department of Accounting, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia
  • Eni Srihastuti Department of Accounting, Universitas Islam Kadiri, Kediri, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.297

Keywords:

Voluntary Tax Compliance , Theory of Planned Behavior, Behavioral Governance , Institutional Legitimacy

Abstract

Contemporary tax compliance research has increasingly shifted from deterrence-based models toward behavioral frameworks that emphasize psychological, social, and institutional determinants of voluntary compliance. Despite advances in digital tax administration, compliance rates in many developing contexts remain volatile, suggesting that technological modernization alone is insufficient to transform taxpayer behavior. Drawing on the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB), this study examines how attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control interact to shape taxpayers’ compliance intentions and behaviors within the policy implementation context of the Directorate General of Taxes (DGT) in Kediri, Indonesia. Employing a qualitative case study design, data were collected through in-depth interviews with tax officials, individual and corporate taxpayers, and MSME association representatives, complemented by observations and document analysis. The findings reveal that positive compliance intentions emerge from perceived fiscal transparency, reputational pressures within business networks, and improved access to administrative support; however, a persistent intention–behavior gap remains when digital literacy constraints and financial stress undermine perceived behavioral control. The study demonstrates that trust-based compliance requires an integrated intervention framework that simultaneously strengthens institutional legitimacy, social norms, and operational capacity. Theoretically, this research extends TPB by contextualizing its constructs within institutional transformation from sanction-based to trust-based governance. Practically, it provides evidence-based policy recommendations for enhancing long-term voluntary compliance in decentralized tax administrations.

References

Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbe2.195

Bǎtrâncea, L. M., Nichita, R. A., Bǎtrâncea, I., & Moldovan, B. A. (2012). Tax compliance models: From economic to behavioral approaches. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 36, 13–26.

Batrancea, L., Nichita, A., Olsen, J., Kogler, C., Kirchler, E., Hoelzl, E., Weiss, A., Torgler, B., Fooken, J., Fuller, J., Schaffner, M., Banuri, S., Hassanein, M., Alarcón-García, G., Aldemir, C., Apostol, O., Bank Weinberg, D., Batrancea, I., Belianin, A., … Zukauskas, S. (2019). Trust and power as determinants of tax compliance across 44 nations. Journal of Economic Psychology, 74(July), 102191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.102191

Bhusal, T. (2019). Do Informal Forums Matter? Lessons from Nepal’s Local Policymaking. The International Journal of Community and Social Development, 1(4), 310–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516602619896187

Canales, H. B. G., Challco, J. M., Cubas, W. E. V., & Flores, F. R. F. (2024). Financing of municipal current expenditure through local taxes: a systematic review. Qubahan Academic Journal, 4(4), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.48161/qaj.v4n4a985

Çapar, G. (2025). The service conception between sociological and normative legitimacy. Jurisprudence, 0(0), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2025.2524276

Castañeda, N. (2024). Fairness and Tax Morale in Developing Countries. Studies in Comparative International Development, 59(1), 113–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12116-023-09394-z

Chernozub, O. (2022). Theory of (Un)Planned Behavior? How our behavioral predictions suffer from “unplanned” actions. Russian Sociological Review, 21(4), 82–105. https://doi.org/10.17323/1728-192X-2022-4-82-105

Costa, S., Duyck, W., & Dirix, N. (2025). Preventing hazardous exposure to suspended loads with nudge interventions. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 97(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2025.105665

Fırtın, C. E., Akyuz, M., Bilbil, E. T., & Karkin, N. (2025). Digital accountability through e-participation: the moderating role of the digital divide. Public Money and Management, 0962, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2573784

Galvão, A. B., & Owyang, M. T. (2018). Financial Stress Regimes and the Macroeconomy. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 50(7), 1479–1505. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmcb.12491

Gangl, K., Hofmann, E., Hartl, B., & Berkics, M. (2020). The impact of powerful authorities and trustful taxpayers: evidence for the extended slippery slope framework from Austria, Finland, and Hungary. Policy Studies, 2872, 98–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1577375

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Liyonna, S. A., Suaidah, I., & Srihastuti, E. (2026). Unveiling the Dynamics of Tax Compliance: The Implementation and Challenges of the Directorate General of Tax . Economics, Business, Accounting & Society Review, 5(1), 37–48. https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.297