Constructing Resilience in Social Enterprises through Managing Value Tension in Commercial Accounting Practices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v5i1.280Keywords:
Social Entrepreneurship, Value Tension, Behavioral Accounting, Coping MechanismAbstract
This study examines how social enterprises construct resilience in response to value tension arising from the dominance of commercial accounting practices in the Indonesian context. Prior studies have extensively explored value tension in relation to funding, mission complexity, and stakeholder conflict, however limited attention has been given to the role of accounting as an active source of tension and behavioral response. This research adopts an interpretive approach using ethnomethodology to explore how actors construct meaning and respond to pressure in their daily practices. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, observations, and documentation at PT Rumah Mocaf Indonesia. The findings reveal that commercial accounting practices function as structural stressors that shape organizational perception and decision-making. In response, social entrepreneurs develop coping mechanisms through reinterpretation of profit, positioning it as a strategic instrument for sustaining social impact rather than an end goal. Cost control and profit-sharing practices emerge as adaptive strategies that balance efficiency demands with social commitments, particularly in protecting farmer welfare. These practices reflect both active and emotion-focused coping, which collectively form a dynamic process of resilience. This study contributes to the literature by positioning accounting as a socially constructed mechanism that both generates and mediates value tension. It extends resilience theory into organizational practice and enriches behavioral accounting by demonstrating how accounting practices are negotiated and reinterpreted in hybrid organizations. The findings offer practical insights for designing adaptive accounting strategies in social enterprises operating under institutional constraints.
References
Ali, M., Qureshi, M. I., & Mustapha, I. (2019). SROI in Social Enterprises: A Systematic Literature Review of Recent Trends and Future Agenda. In L.-P. Dana & V. Ratten (Eds.), Societal Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness (pp. 203–226). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-83867-471-720191014
Andreaus, M., & Costa, E. (2014). Toward an integrated accountability model for nonprofit organizations. In Accountability and social accounting for social and non-profit organizations. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
Ansari, S., Munir, K., & Gregg, T. (2012). Impact at the ‘bottom of the pyramid’: The role of social capital in capability development and community empowerment. Journal of Management Studies, 49(4), 813–842.
Austin, J., Stevenson, H., & Wei–Skillern, J. (2006). Social and Commercial Entrepreneurship: Same, Different, or Both? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00107.x
Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing–Insights from the study of social enterprises. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.
Battilana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 51–55.
Bhattarai, C. R., Kwong, C. C. Y., & Tasavori, M. (2019). Market orientation, market disruptiveness capability and social enterprise performance: An empirical study from the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Research, 96, 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2018.10.042
Bidet, E., Eum, H., & Ryu, J. (2018). Diversity of Social Enterprise Models in South Korea. Voluntas, 29(6), 1261–1273. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-018-9951-8
British Council. (2018a). Asean Social Enterprise Structuring Guide. In British Council (Issue February).
British Council. (2018b). Developing an Inclusive and Creative Economy: The State of Social Enterprise in Indonesia. British Council.
Bullough, A., & Renko, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times. Business Horizons, 56(3), 343–350.
Cornforth, C. (2014). Understanding and combating mission drift in social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 10(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-09-2013-0036
Defourny, J., & Nyssens, M. (2017). Fundamentals for an International Typology of Social Enterprise Models. Voluntas, 28(6), 2469–2497. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11266-017-9884-7
Dillard, J. F. (1991). Accounting as a critical social science. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 4(1), 0.
Dufays, F. (2019). Exploring the drivers of tensions in social innovation management in the context of social entrepreneurial teams. Management Decision, 57(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-01-2017-0089
Gamar, N., & Djamhuri, A. (2015). Auditor internal sebagai “dokter” fraud di pemerintah daerah. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(1), 107–123.
García-Jurado, A., Pérez-Barea, J. J., & Nova, R. J. (2021). A New Approach to Social Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. In Sustainability (Vol. 13, Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052754
Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Prentice Hall, Inc.
Haryanti, D. M., Hati, S. R. H., & Anggriyani, D. S. (2020). Profit Untuk Misi Sosial. DBS Foundation.
Haryanti, D. M., Hati, S. R. H., Wirastuti, A., & Susanto, K. (2016). Berani Jadi Wirausaha Sosial? DBS Fondation, 336.
Hendriani, W. (2022). Resiliensi psikologi sebuah pengantar. Prenada Media.
Hertanto, A. W. (2007). Aspek-aspek Penting untuk Dipahami oleh Para Ahli/Praktisi Hukum terhadap Penyusunan Laporan Keuangan pada Suatu Perseroan Terbatas (Suatu Pendekatan Good Corporate Governance). Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 38(1), 1–34.
Idris, A., & Hati, S. R. H. (2013). Social Entrepreneurship in Indonesia: Lessons from the Past. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 4(3), 277–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2013.820778
Kamayanti, A. (2016). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Akuntansi: Pengantar Religiositas Keilmuan. Penerbit Peneleh.
Kania, J., & Kramer, M. R. (2018). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 9(1), 36–41.
Lindawati, L. (2018). Kekuatan Cerita dalam Bisnis Sosial. Jurnal Studi Pemuda, 7(2), 100–110. https://doi.org/10.22146/studipemudaugm.39643
Loh, J. M. I., & Dahesihsari, R. (2013). Resilience and economic empowerment: A qualitative investigation of entrepreneurial Indonesian women. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 21(01), 107–121.
Luke, B. (2016). Measuring and Reporting on Social Performance: From Numbers and Narratives to a Useful Reporting Framework for Social Enterprises. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 36(2), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969160X.2015.1103298
Luke, B., Barraket, J., & Eversole, R. (2013). Measurement as legitimacy versus legitimacy of measures. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 10(3/4), 234–258. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRAM-08-2012-0034
Mäkelä, H., Gibbon, J., & Costa, E. (2017). Social enterprise, accountability and social accounting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 37(1), 1–5.
Manetti, G. (2014). The Role of Blended Value Accounting in the Evaluation of Socio-Economic Impact of Social Enterprises. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 25(2), 443–464. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9346-1
Manicas, P. (1993). Accounting as a human science. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 18(2–3), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(93)90031-Z
Monllor, J., & Murphy, P. J. (2017). Natural disasters, entrepreneurship, and creation after destruction: A conceptual approach. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 23(4), 618–637.
Musmini, L. S., & Sirajudin, S. (2016). Makna akuntansi sosial dan sustainabilitas sekaa suka duka. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 7(2), 156–170.
Nicholls, A. (2009). ‘We do good things, don’t we?’: ‘Blended Value Accounting’ in social entrepreneurship. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6–7), 755–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AOS.2009.04.008
Nurhalimah, Setiawan, A. R., & Haryadi, B. (2019). Praktik Akuntansi Manajemen Bisnis Besi Tua Berbasis Budaya Persaudaraan Madura. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 10, No. 1(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2019.04.10001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mochammad Charis Setiawan, Mohammad Iqbal Firdaus, Erna Sulistyowati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










