Enhancing Fraud Detection: Roles of Skepticism, Audit Technology, and Industry Specialization in Indonesia

Authors

  • Arrum Azzahra Rusli Department of Accounting, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Yusnaini Yusnaini Department of Accounting, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia
  • Sukanto Sukanto Department of Accounting, Universitas Sriwijaya, Palembang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v4i1.203

Keywords:

Fraud Detection, Professional Skepticism, Auditor Ethic, Audit Technology, Auditor Industry Specialization

Abstract

Fraud remains a persistent threat to financial reporting, particularly in developing countries like Indonesia where corruption is deeply entrenched. Despite advancements in auditing standards, limitations in fraud detection continue to undermine audit quality and public trust. This study aims to investigate the impact of professional skepticism, auditor ethics, and audit technology on fraud detection, with auditor industry specialization as a moderating variable. Using a quantitative approach, data were collected via questionnaires from 233 public accountants across 88 Indonesian public accounting firms and analyzed using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings reveal that professional skepticism and audit technology significantly enhance fraud detection, while auditor ethics does not show a direct significant effect. Industry specialization significantly moderates the relationship between professional skepticism and fraud detection, as well as between auditor ethics and fraud detection. However, it does not moderate the effect of audit technology on fraud detection. These results suggest that skepticism and technology are critical competencies in fraud detection, but their effectiveness is further amplified when coupled with contextual industry expertise. Conversely, ethical awareness alone is insufficient unless supported by domain-specific knowledge. The study underscores the importance of enhancing professional training and developing sector-specific audit practices to strengthen fraud detection capabilities in Indonesia.

References

Achmad, T., Ghozali, I., & Pamungkas, I. D. (2022). Hexagon Fraud: Detection of Fraudulent Financial Reporting in State-Owned Enterprises Indonesia. Economies, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies10010013

Aghazadeh, S., & Joe, J. R. (2022). Auditors’ response to management confidence and misstatement risk. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 101, 101348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aos.2022.101348

Ahmed, H. M. S., El-Halaby, S., & Albitar, K. (2023). Board governance and audit report lag in the light of big data adoption: the case of Egypt. International Journal of Accounting and Information Management, 31(1), 148–169. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJAIM-04-2022-0088

Alsharif, H., & Symons, J. (2021). Open-mindedness as a Corrective Virtue. Philosophy, 96(1), 73–97. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0031819120000352

Ashtiani, M. N., & Raahemi, B. (2022). Intelligent Fraud Detection in Financial Statements Using Machine Learning and Data Mining: A Systematic Literature Review. IEEE Access, 10, 72504–72525. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3096799

Austin, A. A. (2023). Remembering Fraud in the Future: Investigating and Improving Auditors’ Attention to Fraud during Audit Testing+. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 925–951. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12843

Backof, A. G., Bowlin, K., & Goodson, B. M. (2022). The Importance of Clarification of Auditors’ Responsibilities Under the New Audit Reporting Standards*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2284–2304. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12802

Bell, T. B., & Bryan, D. B. (2021). Effectiveness, efficiency, and fee premiums in audits led by industry specialist partners. Accounting & Finance, 61(3), 4513–4572. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12739

Cahan, S. F., Che, L., Knechel, W. R., & Svanström, T. (2022). Do Audit Teams Affect Audit Production and Quality? Evidence from Audit Teams’ Industry Knowledge*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 39(4), 2657–2695. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12807

Carrera, N., & Van Der Kolk, B. (2021). Auditor ethics: do experience and gender influence auditors’ moral awareness? Managerial Auditing Journal, 36(3), 463–484. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-07-2020-2745

Chen, Y.-H., Wang, K.-J., & Liu, S.-H. (2023). How Personality Traits and Professional Skepticism Affect Auditor Quality? A Quantitative Model. Sustainability, 15(2), 1547. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021547

De Santis, F., & D’Onza, G. (2021). Big data and data analytics in auditing: in search of legitimacy. Meditari Accountancy Research, 29(5), 1088–1112. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-03-2020-0838

Dharmasiri, P., Phang, S.-Y., Prasad, A., & Webster, J. (2022). Consequences of Ethical and Audit Violations: Evidence from the PCAOB Settled Disciplinary Orders. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 179–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04786-4

Eulerich, M., Masli, A., Pickerd, J., & Wood, D. A. (2023). The Impact of Audit Technology on Audit Task Outcomes: Evidence for Technology‐Based Audit Techniques*. Contemporary Accounting Research, 40(2), 981–1012. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12847

Fullerton, R., & Durtschi, C. (2011). The Effect of Professional Skepticism on the Fraud Detection Skills of Internal Auditors. SSRN Electronic Journal, 435. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.617062

Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022). Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116429. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429

Hurtt, R. K. (2010). Development of a scale to measure professional skepticism. Auditing, 29(1), 149–171. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2010.29.1.149

Junaidi, Hendrian, & Syahputra, B. E. (2024). Fraud detection in public sector institutions: an empirical study in Indonesia. Cogent Business and Management, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2024.2404479

Litan, W., Minxun, Q., & Yongzhe, W. (2024). Does audit quality affect firm innovation? Industrial Marketing Management, 117(August 2023), 402–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2024.01.011

Malle, B. F. (2008). Fritz Heider’s Legacy. Social Psychology, 39(3), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335.39.3.163

Mardawi, Z., Seguí-Mas, E., & Tormo-Carbó, G. (2023). Wave after wave: unboxing 40 years of auditing ethics research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 31(6), 1886–1918. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEDAR-05-2022-1698

Martinov‐Bennie, N., Dyball, M. C., & Tweedie, D. (2022). Professional skepticism through audit praxis: An Aristotelian perspective. International Journal of Auditing, 26(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijau.12258

McMartin, J., & Pickavance, T. (2024). Affective Reason. Episteme, 21(3), 819–836. https://doi.org/10.1017/epi.2022.45

Muda, I., Davis, K. V., Erlina, E., Kholis, A., & Gusnardi, G. (2020). Audit Lag Criteria Report as a Determination of the Reliability and Quality of Auditor’s Report in Indonesia. Research in World Economy, 11(6), 96. https://doi.org/10.5430/rwe.v11n6p96

Nazri, S. N. F. S. M., Zahba, I. H., Zolkaflil, S., & Zainuddin, N. (2023). The Influence of Professional Skepticism on Fraud Detection: The Case of Malaysian Non – Big 4 Auditors. Management and Accounting Review, 22(1), 201–228. https://doi.org/10.24191/mar.v22i01-09

Nguyen, P. T., Kend, M., & Le, D. Q. (2024). Digital transformation in Vietnam: the impacts on external auditors and their practices. Pacific Accounting Review, 36(1), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1108/PAR-04-2023-0051

Poje, T., & Zaman Groff, M. (2022). Mapping Ethics Education in Accounting Research: A Bibliometric Analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(2), 451–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04846-9

Samagaio, A., & Diogo, T. A. (2022). Effect of Computer Assisted Audit Tools on Corporate Sustainability. Sustainability (Switzerland), 14(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020705

Seethamraju, R., & Hecimovic, A. (2023). Adoption of artificial intelligence in auditing: An exploratory study. Australian Journal of Management, 48(4), 780–800. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962221108440

Soroushyar, A. (2023). Auditor characteristics and the financial reporting quality: the moderating role of the client business strategy. Asian Journal of Accounting Research, 8(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJAR-01-2022-0020

Susanto, H., Mulyani, S., Sukmadilaga, C., & Ghani, E. K. (2022). Sustaining Investigative Audit Quality through Auditor Competency and Digital Forensic Support: A Consensus Study. Sustainability, 14(22), 15141. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215141

Tuan Mansor, T. M., Mohamad Ariff, A., & Hashim, H. A. (2020). Whistleblowing by auditors: the role of professional commitment and independence commitment. Managerial Auditing Journal, 35(8), 1033–1055. https://doi.org/10.1108/MAJ-11-2019-2484

Wahidahwati, W., & Asyik, N. F. (2022). Determinants of Auditors Ability in Fraud Detection. Cogent Business and Management, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2022.2130165

Yulianti, Y., Zarkasyi, M. W., Suharman, H., & Soemantri, R. (2024). Effects of professional commitment, commitment to ethics, internal locus of control and emotional intelligence on the ability to detect fraud through reduced audit quality behaviors. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, 15(3), 385–401. https://doi.org/10.1108/JIABR-02-2021-0076

Zhang, Y., & Wei, L. (2022). Philanthropy, audit firms culture and auditor independence. PLOS ONE, 17(11), e0277567. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277567

Zimmerman, A. “Ally” B., Barr-Pulliam, D., Lee, J.-S., & Minutti-Meza, M. (2023). Auditors’ Use of In‐House Specialists. Journal of Accounting Research, 61(4), 1363–1418. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12485

Downloads

Published

2025-05-03

How to Cite

Rusli, A. A., Yusnaini, Y., & Sukanto, S. (2025). Enhancing Fraud Detection: Roles of Skepticism, Audit Technology, and Industry Specialization in Indonesia. Economics, Business, Accounting & Society Review, 4(1), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.55980/ebasr.v4i1.203